That of course depends on whom you ask and when.
Terrorism is derivative of terror, from the Latin terrorem:
something that intimidates, an object to be feared. Of greater relevance to
modern usage though is the 11th century Roman term, terror cimbricus, which
referred to the fear in the ranks as an army was anticipating a battle with a
fierce enemy. Watch the first few minutes of Saving Private Ryan before the
ramps on the Higgins Boats go down. Men shaking, retching, smoking, some of
them laughing in response to the abject fear. This state of dread is terror cimbricus,
and it is the point of terrorism; not necessarily the spectacular assaults, but
rather the unease that inhabits the time between them.
The guillotining of Louis XVI in Paris ushered in the
Jacobins, led by Maximilien Robespierre, who routinely guillotined his political
opponents in the town square. This period in France’s history would become
known as The Reign of Terror. In a tip of the hat to terror cimbricus, a well understood
term in those days, a journalist for The London Times coined the word terrorism
to describe the actions of Robespierre. In 1795, it was entered into the Oxford
English Dictionary as describing government by intimidation.
The definition has since come to mean the use of violence to
coerce or intimidate governments or civilians. So when did that
happen? Well, it took some doing. First, unrest in Russia in the late 19th
century led to the rise of The People’s Will, a reasonably successful group of
assassins who killed Alexander II among other prominent political figures. A
giddy American press watching Russia in turmoil described the covert, committed
and surgically accurate assassins as terrorists, only with a connotation of
revolutionary gusto, while still implying the reek of being less than
moralistic.
American newspaper writers would wrestle the word “terrorism”
back again to its original meaning in the 1930s to describe the totalitarian
governments of the time, notably Russia and Italy, Stalin known in those years
as “The Great Terror.” Then after World
War II, the pendulum swung back to the revolutionary nuance of the word, only
this time without the glint of approval, as it was happening to the friends of
post-war industrialists seeking to make the most out of fresh treaties and new
borders, and so began the contemporary definition of the indiscriminate killer
of innocents, often to political or religious ends, sometimes indiscriminately. It is such a good word, such a
prima facie indictment of its target that it couldn't lay fallow while the enemy
was our own so the definition had to be managed a bit, and that was all done in
the press.
The definition of terrorism is fluid, and it has been since
its initial coinage, largely massaged by power and media, and in classic
Orwellian 1984 Newspeak, terrorism has now come to mean its own original
opposite. That one of the most important news stories of my lifetime is a
contranym spanning the centuries is just one example of why words fascinate me.
No comments:
Post a Comment