The word elder drips with age. It fairly creaks. It is wise and learned.
Decades of knowledge, philosophy, joy and sorrow rest within elder’s inferred laudations.
Part of the distinction between elder and older is that elder may
only refer to human beings, whereas older
is an equal opportunity age descriptor. Some naturalists buck that trend in
great ape studies, but their efforts have yet to expand the definition.
Elder
in general is giving way to older,
and that’s fine. Elder can’t go out
alone. It always has to have a noun to modify, and not just any noun. It has to
be a group of human beings. Fussy old coot.
Plus, elder sounds a little pretentious. And what is
this “humans only” restriction? The bristlecone pine at 5,000 can’t be the
eldest tree, but if you’re a first-born teenager, then you’re the eldest of
your siblings? Seems egotistical.
That’s the way it is with elder though.
It must modify a noun that defines a human group. Elder can function without a noun, but only if the noun is implied.
Elder is nice to have, and it connotes respect where respect is due, but its proper use is fairly restricted.
No comments:
Post a Comment