"What it is is,” is a popular construction that to me feels like a soapbox of
condescension wherein the speaker can imply a pedagogical relationship between
him and the listener. In the mind's eye of its utterer, the student sits lotus-legged, gazing up in
doe-eyed hero worship at the guru, the Buddha, the subject matter expert.
“You may think grammar is for pussies,” says Grammar Dick as
he hitches up his belt and spits a stream of tobacco juice that splashes his boots. “But that’s not what it is. What it is is a message that you care enough to have learned the language’s
rules and conventions. What it is is an act of love.”
A noble sentiment, but delivered in a didactic
tone. I recommend avoiding it always. Most
especially don’t write or say, “What it is is what it is.” If you’re going to
do something that horrible, at least shuffle that deck into the clichéd but
slightly more tolerable, “It is what it is.”
The “is is” construction is bad in every way; in
its redundancy, in its unmusicality, and in its way of letting you know the upcoming
speech is intended to salve a human ego rather than solve a human problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment